胡光

• 1:河南师范大学法学院

• 
  

摘要(Abstract)：

作为应对与日俱增、日趋复杂的互联网版权侵权问题的手段之一，基于算法的内容自动识别技术正在世界范围内得到青睐，适用范围逐步扩大。但同时，其在言论自由保护、识别误差规避、正当程序设计等方面存在的问题也日益凸显，受到包括法律界在内的各方的质疑。通过对算法识别技术应用手段的梳理，提出对于该技术的规制可以通过明确适用许可、增加透明度要求、原则性条款的技术嵌入以及制定量化判断标准等科技创新与规则制定深度融合的方式予以解决，从而实现各方利益相关者的平衡。

关键词(KeyWords)：数字环境;算法版权执法;规范

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author):胡光

参考文献(References)：

• [1]European Parliament and of the Council.Directive 2016/0280 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 2018 on Copyright in the Digital Single Market[EB/OL].[2018-05-25].https://perma.cc/GR26-5NE4.

• [2]Act to Improve Enforcement of the Law in Social Networks:Nicht Offizielle übersetzung[EB/OL].[2017-10-01].https://www.bmj.de/SharedDocs/Gesetzgebungsverfahren/Dokumente/NetzDG_engl.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2.

• [3]Annemarie Bridy& Daphne Keller.U.S.Copyright Office Section 512 Study:Comments in Response to Second Notice of Inquiry 27-30[EB/OL].[2015-06-08].https://perma.cc/7GYK-SG7A.

• [4]Niva Elkin-Koren.Fair Use by Design[J],UCLA L.REV.1 2017(64):1090-1094.

• [5]Federal Court of Justice.Bundesgerichtshof Mar.11,2004,I ZR 304/01.

• [6]European Commission.Proposal for a Regulation on a Single Market for Digital Services[EB/OL].[2020-12-15].https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/proposal_for_a_regulation_on_a_single_market_for_digital_services.pdfP.4.

• [7]European Digital Single Market Directive ImplementationsUpdate.MoreProposals to Protect User Rights[EB/OL].[2021-06-10].http://infojustice.org/archives/42886.

• [8]谭洋.在线内容分享服务提供商的一般过滤义务：基于《欧盟数字化单一市场版权指令》[J].知识产权，2019(6):66-69.

• [9]Google[EB/OL].[2021-12-21].https://blog.Google/outrains-initiatives/public-policy/continuing-to-create-value-while/.

• [10]Mayer.Content Moderation for End-to-End Encrypted Messaging[J].Princeton University,2019(2):46.

• [11]Joseetal.Copyright Protection using Digital Watermarking[J].NCACSA,2012(3):12.

• [12]MartinHusovec.The Promises of Algorithmic Copyright Enforcement:Takedown or Staydown?Which Is Superior?And Why?The Promises of Algorithmic Copyright Enforcement[J].42Colum.J.L.& ARTS,2018(3):78.

• [13]SWIPO.WIPO Technology Trends 2019-Artificial Intelligence[EB/OL].[2019-08-19].https://www.wipo.int/publications/zh/details.jsp?id=4386&plang=EN.

• [14]骆京.基于人工智能技术的内容识别系统设计[J].现代电视技术，2018(7):113.

• [15]Niva Elkin-Koren.Fair Use by Design,UCLA Law Review[J].2017(64):1088-1092.

• [16]李安.机器学习作品的著作权法分析：非作品性使用、合理使用与侵权使用[J].电子知识产权，2020(6):63-65.

• [17]曹建峰.欧盟版权法改革中的大数据与人工智能问题研究[EB/OL].[2021-05-06].https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/86982601.

• [18]Niva Elkin-Koren.Fair Use by Design[J].UCLA L.Rev,2017(64):1088-1092.

• [19]Ben Depoorter& Robert Kirk Walker.Copyright False Positives[J].Nodre.Danm.L.REV,2013(89):319.

• [20]Lester.Toni Pachamanova.Dessislava.The Dilemma of False Positives:Making Content ID Algorithms more Conducive to Fostering Innovative Fair Use in Music Creation[J].UCLA Entertainment Law Review,2017(24):58.

• [21]李成.人工智能歧视的法律治理[J].中国法学，2021(2):128-132.

• [22]Niva Elkin-Koren.Fair Use by Design[J].UCLA L.REV,2017(64):1088-1092.

• [23]Danielle Keats Citron.Technological Due Process[J].Wash.U.L.Rev,2018(85):1249-1252.

• [24]Melville B.Nimmer.Does Copyright Abridge the First Amendment Guarantees of Free Speech and Press[J].UCLA L.REV,1970(17):125.

• [25]Pierre N.Leval.Toward a Fair Use Standard[J].Harv.L.Rev,1990(103):256.

• [26]Mike Masnick,.Sony Music Issues Takedown on Copyright Lecture About Music Copyrights by Harvard Law.Professor[EB/OL].[2016-08-17].https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160214/08293233599/sony-music-issues-takedown-copyright-lecture-about-music-copyrights-harvard-law-professor.shtml.

• [27]Open Letter to the European Commission.On the Importance of Preserving the Consistency and Integrity of the EU[EB/OL].[2021-05-07].https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2850483.

• [28]Dan L.Burk & Julie E.Cohen.Fair Use Infrastructure for Rights Management Systems[J].HARV.J.L.& TECH,2001(4):15.

• [29]A.Bridy.The Price of Closing the “Value Gap:How the Music Industry Hacked EU Copyright Reform”[J].Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law,2020(2).

• [30]Martin Husovec.Algorithmic protection of exceptions and limitations in the Copyright DSM directive[J].The Promises of Algorithmic Copyright Enforcement.Colum.J.L.& ARTS,2020(42):107.

• [31]万勇.人工智能时代的版权法通知：移除制度[J].中外法学，2019(5):1264-1269.

• [32]崔国斌.论网络服务商版权内容过滤义务[J].中国法学，2017(2):231-235.

• [33]Fourth meeting of the Stakeholder Dialogue on Article 17 of the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market,Presentation by Vance Ikezoye [EB/OL][2021-12-16].https://webcast.ec.europa.eu/copyright-stakeholder-dialogues-16-12.

• [34]Digital Markets Act:Ensuring fair and open digital [EB/OL][2021-04-09].https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/QANDA_20_2349.

• [35]Maayan Perel.&Niva Elkin Koren.Accountability in Algorithmic Copyright Enforcement[J].Stan.Tech.L.Rrv,2016(19):476-481.

• [36]European Commission.Proposal for a Regulation on a Single Market for Digital Services[EB/OL].[2020-12-15].https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/proposal_for_a_regulation_on_a_single_market_for_digital_services.pdfP.4.

• [37]Maayan Perel.&Niva Elkin Koren.Accountability in Algorithmic Copyright Enforcement[J].Stan.Tech.L.Rrv,2016(19):474-479.

• [38]Glenn Gabe,Google’s Pirate Algorithm and DMCA Takedowns Exploring the Impact Threshold,G-Squared Interactive[EB/OL][2013-12-09].http://www.gsqi.com/marketing-blog/google-pirate-algorithm-dmca.

• [39]A country by country analysis of EU copyright reform implementation[EB/OL][2021-05-01].https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/analysis/country-by-country-copyright-directive.

• [40]Danielle Keats Citron.Technological Due Process[J].Wash.U.L.Rev,2018(6):1250-1258.

• [41]European Commission.Proposal for a Regulation on a Single Market_for Digital Services[EB/OL][2020-12-15].https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/proposal for a regulation ona single market fordigital services.pdf.